Dissemination: explaining how it works in the webpage intro

As per my previous post, I put the idea out there that I might want and need to have some form of (short) explanatory spiel to explain to the reader unfamiliar with my work of what it exactly is that I'm trying to do. Although necessarily short (but I include my 'rationale for alternative format as an appendice?') this could include the following:

• that this is itself intended to be a multimodal artefact
  
• that all the work is my own - word, sound, image - and the assemblage is in itself informed by my research into the subject 
  
• that I haven't simply tried to transfer words from page to screen
• how the reader might want to navigate through the essay
  
• justification for inclusion of music and how it can be used to inform the experience
  
• [that this is intended to be experienced as a digital multimodal assignment, however a text only version is available - personally not sure about this - sounds a bit like bottling out]

Just a thought, but is there any merit in including each of these different points alongside or beneath or somehow connected to nice pithy quotes that offer a justification for each approach? It's unconventional, but then so is the rest of the format. Would this make it look like a mini version of the rationale? Something to think about.