DR JAMES LAMB
  • About
  • Publications
  • BLOG
  • About
  • Publications
  • BLOG

Replying to Sian's feedback

29/10/2012

0 Comments

 
Last night I e-mail replied to Sian in response to her feedback on my October 25/26 dissertation abstract. Here's the content of the e-mail I sent:
Hello Sian - thanks for the valuable feedback. I'm really glad you like the idea and hopefully things are now beginning to take shape.

I've given your comments some thought over the weekend and have responded to what I think were the main questions/issues you highlighted. I've responded to the different issues below. Your original comments are in quotation marks for clarity.

--
        
"I like the cross-disciplinary aspect very much: my only concern would be that focussing on online programmes is going to limit the extent to which you're able to engage across disciplines, because multimodal assignments are still a relatively niche activity. I think you could afford to do this across online and offline modes, and then it would hopefully widen the field a little across the Colleges, in terms of identifying who is doing this kind of teaching/assessment. It would also perhaps allow you to pull in data from disciplines in ECA where 'crits' are standard."

Yes, I agree  about not restricting it to online programmes. In fact as I read over the abstract before sending it off, I did wonder whether limiting the scope to online learning might leave me short in terms of potential interviewees and cases to observe. What might be regarded as an alternative format assignment in some disciplines would be the norm in the likes of art and design and therefore not alternative at all, in fact.

--

"I'm guessing your focus would be on teacher interviews (rather than student), alongside observation and visual 'reading' of assignments?"

Yes, I would intend to focus on staff. I felt I would be attempting to cover too much if I interviewed students and staff. 

I felt observation would provide with me with insights and understanding that might not emerge from interview data.

The visual exercise is partly at your prompting and partly because I think it will be interesting. It feels risky (in that it is a relatively unfamiliar methodology to me) but interesting at the same time.

--

"The main risk perhaps would be that people are sensitive about their assessment proceedures and so may be reluctant to expose too much. This is potentially quite a big concern. One option might be to focus on the MSc in E-learning and use that as an exploratory study - I know there is quite a bit of variation in practice across the teaching team here, making an evaluative interrogation of practice useful to us, and also providing a way in to a field where we know there is a lot of interesting data in the form of student work (much of it already accessible on the open web)."

It would be great to focus on MSc team. Apart from an interest point of view, from a pragmatic perspective it might be more straightforward to encourage participation compared to approaching staff from programmes where I have no standing/trust (particularly considering the sensitive nature of assessment, as you suggest). And the accessibility of work via the web might also reduce potential ethical barriers that might exist with other courses. My question here though would be whether focusing solely on the MSc would be overly narrow? I would lose the multi-disciplinary element, unless of course I carried out observation (but not interviews) within other programmes?

--

"The downside is that it's a single programme/discipline and may be over-familiar to you. Having said that, a manageable, small-scale project like this would do some good groundwork for a PhD proposal which took the wider, cross-disciplinary view."

Would my over-familiarity be a problem in the sense that it could be seen as reducing my effectiveness in research and analysing data? I do like the idea of 'manageable, small scale' - to me that suggests striving from critical depth over breadth, not something I've always achieved in the MSc to date.

--

In summary then, the idea of focusing on the MSc in E-Learning programme is very attractive, as long as it wouldn't be seen as overly narrow or that I would be 'too close' to make meaningful observations and so on. I would really like this to be focused and manageable so that I go into critical depth. 

I hope my comments make sense. Look forward to hearing what you think in due course although I appreciate you're busy.

James
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Abandoned Ideas
    Abstract
    Acknowledge And Bib.
    Actions/things To Do
    Appendix
    Brian Eno
    Carey Jewitt
    Conclusion
    Constellation Map
    Data
    Data Emergent Ideas
    Digital Spaces
    Dissemination
    Dissemination Rationale
    Eca
    Ethics
    Fitzpatrick
    Glossary
    Hypertext Links
    Ideas
    Image
    Interviews
    Kress
    Land
    Literature/reading
    Lit Review
    Meetings
    Methodology
    Music
    Natasa Lackovic
    Observation
    Photography
    Research Proposal
    Sian
    Soundtrack
    Stephen Hunter
    Time Needed For M
    Title
    Uni Crest
    Vectors
    Video
    Visual

    Archives

    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Timeline

    Picture
    Other stuff
    Resources page
    Moodle
    EDC13
[email protected]